Assignments
Every matter has a responsible attorney and the staff who actually run it. Ownership is visible on the deadline, the task, and the invoice.
You cannot take the next client if you cannot see the ones you have.
A firm that can see every case, without spending the day managing it, has an advantage over overworked opposing counsel — and room for the clients who follow.
Arden Holdings v. Vantage Systems
A. Shaw
Harbor Trust discovery
M. Voss
Intake · Chen
R. Patel
Status conference
Arden Holdings v. Vantage Systems
Wed · 9:30 a.m. · Dept. 12
Motion hearing — compel escrow ledger
Arden Holdings v. Vantage Systems
Fri · 10:00 a.m. · Dept. 12
Trial setting conference
In re Lot 22-B
Next Tue · 1:30 p.m.
Active matters, due-today work, hearings, intake, unbilled totals, and outstanding invoices on one surface.
Illustrative firm overview. This is the surface where the day’s work is waiting — not a screenshot of a live file.
The operational problem
The date that decides a filing is on someone’s calendar, a standing-order PDF, and a yellow pad. None of them agree on who owns it.
The work that has to happen today is buried in a thread. The person who needs to do it is copied, not assigned.
Documents sit in disconnected folders. Correspondence is in Outlook. The theory of the case is in one attorney’s head. Billing is reconstructed after the fact.
Faktum™ Practice puts the work back in one workspace.
Unified command center
Arden Holdings v. Vantage Systems
A. Shaw
Harbor Trust discovery
M. Voss
Intake · Chen
R. Patel
Status conference
Arden Holdings v. Vantage Systems
Wed · 9:30 a.m. · Dept. 12
Motion hearing — compel escrow ledger
Arden Holdings v. Vantage Systems
Fri · 10:00 a.m. · Dept. 12
Trial setting conference
In re Lot 22-B
Next Tue · 1:30 p.m.
A. Shaw completed internal target on the SJ opposition
12 minutes ago
M. Voss linked three Outlook messages to the Harbor Trust matter
1 hour ago
R. Patel converted Chen from intake to a contact
Yesterday
Active matters, due-today work, hearings, intake, unbilled totals, and outstanding invoices on one surface.
Illustrative firm overview. The dashboard is a working surface — counts, queues, and owners — not a decorative graphic.
Matter workspace
Phase · Discovery. Next hearing · status conference Wednesday.
Claim posture
Record is in the matter; strategy notes live here until the planned Strategy connection.
Work requiring action
Hard date Friday. Internal target was yesterday. Owner A. Shaw.
Economics
12.4 hours on drafting and meet-and-confer. Costs for the messenger filing still open.
Move from the case summary to the work that requires action without leaving the matter.
Illustrative matter workspace. Use the tabs to move through Case Overview, Strategy Workspace, Deadlines, Filings, Parties, Emails, Ask CM, and Billing.
Deadline control
| Deadline | Hard date | Internal target | Source | Owner | Risk | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Opposition to motion for summary judgment | Fri, May 16 | Wed, May 14 | Mar 28 order · triggering event: service of MSJ | A. Shaw · M. Voss | High | In progress |
| Proof of service — Lot 22-B subpoena | Today | Yesterday | Subpoena issued May 9 | M. Voss | High | Due today |
| Expert disclosure — damages | Jun 6 | May 30 | Scheduling order | M. Voss · J. Okonkwo | Standard | Open |
| Answer — Chen (if engaged) | Not running | — | Intake only · no matter opened | R. Patel | — | Intake |
| Mediation brief — Harbor Trust | Extended to May 22 | May 20 | Stipulation · extension recorded | A. Shaw · M. Voss | Standard | Extended |
Hard Fri, May 16 · Internal Wed, May 14 · A. Shaw
Mar 28 order · triggering event: service of MSJ
Hard Today · Internal Yesterday · M. Voss
Subpoena issued May 9
Hard Jun 6 · Internal May 30 · M. Voss
Scheduling order
Hard Not running · Internal — · R. Patel
Intake only · no matter opened
Hard Extended to May 22 · Internal May 20 · A. Shaw
Stipulation · extension recorded
Supports professional review. Does not replace independent deadline calculation or docket verification.
Faktum™ Practice supports professional review. It does not replace independent deadline calculation or docket verification.
Filings, documents, correspondence
Defendant · filed Mar 28
Served Mar 28. Response due Friday.
Plaintiff · filed Jan 12
Service completed Jan 18. Answer on file.
Served Apr 2
Linked to the deposition task package.
Matter folder
Firm SharePoint library
The folder belongs to the firm. Practice links it to this matter.
Dropbox matter folder
Where the firm keeps it
Alternate provider. Practice does not host the files.
Uploaded correspondence
March 12 letter · preview
Stored with the matter and cited from deadlines and strategy notes.
Outlook · linked yesterday
Converted to a task owned by A. Shaw.
Outlook · linked Monday
Converted to the Wednesday hearing.
Case Inbox · Mar 28
Converted to the filing and the Friday deadline.
SharePoint, Dropbox, and Outlook remain the firm’s own services. Practice links them to the matter; it does not replace or rebrand them.
Workflows and accountability
Every matter has a responsible attorney and the staff who actually run it. Ownership is visible on the deadline, the task, and the invoice.
Reusable task packages for openings, oppositions, discovery sets, and closings — assigned once, tracked until done.
Consults, meet-and-confers, and hearings sit on the matter, not only on a personal calendar.
Due-today and my-work lists so a paralegal or docketing clerk starts from what requires action, not from a search.
A running record of who did what: a filing uploaded, a deadline completed, an email linked, an invoice shared.
Intake, open, discovery, motion practice, trial, closing. Closing is a workflow with owners, not a status someone forgets to set.
Intake through engagement
Name, contact, referring source, and the short statement of the problem.
Recorded on the intake — pending, clear, or held — before anyone treats the matter as opened.
Scheduled against the practice area and the attorney who will take the meeting.
Civil litigation, immigration, family, bankruptcy, real estate disputes — with the fee arrangement and the proposed scope.
On engagement, the intake becomes a Contact and a Matter. The facts already entered travel with it.
Retainer-agreement generation and signature status, tracked on the same record.
Conflict check pending
Consultation Thursday. No matter opened.
Conflict clear · fee discussed
Scope of representation drafted. Signature outstanding.
Converted May 2
Contact and Matter opened. Retainer signed.
Opening an intake does not establish an attorney-client relationship.
Illustrative intake board. A prospect is not a client. Conversion is a deliberate step after conflict check, consultation, and engagement.
Costs, invoices, retainers
Across open matters
Task time captured as the work is done, not reconstructed from memory.
Filings, messengers, transcripts
Recorded against the matter that incurred them.
Draft
PDF ready for review. Not yet shared. No matter opened.
Shared with billing contact
Outstanding. Payment status recorded on the invoice.
Shared
Recorded as paid. The phase remains open.
Invoice PDFs are reviewed before sharing. Payment status is a record on the invoice, not a payment processor.
Illustrative billing view. Faktum™ Practice does not claim to replace trust-account, tax, or payment- processing systems.
09Faktum products
Two products, one firm. The operational record is built to feed the strategic picture. The strategic picture is built to drive the next operational move.
Faktum Practice
Faktum Strategy
Sister products. No live integration is claimed on this page.
10Security and control
Faktum™ Practice is organized around the firm, the role, and the matter. What follows is the architecture of the workspace — not a catalog of certifications.
Each firm works in its own environment. Another firm’s matters are not on the same working surface.
Attorneys, paralegals, docketing, and administration see the work their role is permitted to see.
Deadlines, filings, correspondence, and invoices belong to a matter — not a shared pile.
What a client can see is a deliberate share, not an open file. Intake is not a client portal.
Matter folders remain in the SharePoint or Dropbox the firm already uses. Practice links them; it does not pretend to be those products.
Completions, extensions, waivers, shares, and assignments leave a history of who did what.
The matter is the workspace. Work on one case does not require opening another.
Who it is for
A shared picture of what is due, who owns it, and what remains unbilled.
The calendar, the file, and the invoice in one place, without a department behind you.
From the case summary to the work that requires a decision, without hunting across applications.
A queue of owned work: filings to serve, documents to file, tasks that actually close.
Hard dates, sources, and an audit trail — built for review, not for guessing.
Intake, engagement, retainers, and outstanding invoices without a second set of books.
Relevant for matter-driven practices, including
Practice areas listed here are matter-driven legal work the workspace is designed to hold. Support for a given docket depends on how the firm configures the matter — not a claim that every specialty is fully modeled.
Request access